Why would some people come to an agreement that Professor Dan Markel must be injured? It makes no sense. It only makes sense if the intention to shoot Dan Markel that July morning in 2014, was to execute him-to terminate his life, the most serious criminal offence. Then there would be perceived profit from that murder, namely:(1) Dan Markel, if dead, would no longer be around- hence no access visits;(2) the marital home in Tallahassee, Florida, would autmatically come to the sole possession of ex-wife, unless Dan Markel was intuitive and 'on the ball' and immediately remade his Will on the day of his legal divorce;(3) other parties could forge new lives and child-care would be taken care of by employees;(4) there may be life insurances pay-outs that must be honoured in favour of the other party, unless in trust;(5) no need for squabble over possessions;(6) parties would all keep their decency and midde class lifestyles - apart from the deceased;

(7) no need for any party to be assessed as regards mental health- dangerous -situation as mental health issues would remain untreated;

(8) no forensic financial assessment need be made as to the true status of finances during the course of the marriage and who spent what and where;

(9) importantly- no need for a Jewish Get Divorce settlement to divide up assets;

(10) and FICKLE newspapers and television and social media media would oblige and 'let it ride' to allow remaining family members the privacy they would claim;

(11) the angst generated by the legal process of this legal DIVORCE between Mrs Wendi Markel AKA Wendi Jill Adelson and Daniel Eric Markel, and I guess, with my accountancy and finance background, a settlement would have involved sworn declarations to the court of the wealth accumulated by Wendi Adelson's dentist father, who , with just TWO ACKNOWLEDGED OFFSPRING (since eldest son, a medical doctor, was disowned for marrying an Indian medical doctor and has since fathered mixed-race grand-children, despite complete anger and disapproval of his Adelson parents- dentist Adelson and clerk to dentistry offices-Mr Adelson's wife, the matriarch, his mother) must have much WEALTH wrapped up in Trust Funds and SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES to avoid taxes and for the benefit of his daughter. All this should have been TRANSPARENT to the divorce court.

If lies were told in legal documents with regard to Wendy Markel-ADELSON's DIVORCE FROM PROFESSOR DANIEL ERIC MARKEL, such dishonesty should have led to charges of PERJURY- which is a very serious CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

Revealing such details would result in revelations concerning tax EVASION issues perhaps,  regarding Mr Adelson's COSMETIC DENTISTRY BUSINESSES; and maybe even use of OFFSHORE REPOSITORIES, TRUST FUNDS, UNDECLARED OFFSHORE INVESTMENTS and so on.

In this way, divorce can be a very interesting legal topic if one has expertise or access to experts in  FORENSIC ACCOUNTING.